Editorial peer edits

Paul:
1. Is there a clear point of view? (position)

• Yes

2. Does the Op-Ed state the problem and solution simply?

• Problem is stated clearly, could have been a little more detailed with the solution

3. Does the piece address the counter arguments?

• NO

4. Is the Op-Ed interesting?

• yes, brings in music fans, consumers, and sellers.

5. Are the paragraphs organized logically?

• yes

6. Does each paragraph develop an idea to support the thesis?

• Yes, very well developed

7. Is the writing clear?

• absolutely, it flowed very nicely and kept me interested

Jordan:

1. Is there a clear point of view? (position)

• Yes, he wants the rules to go back to the old rules (five years ago).

2. Does the Op-Ed state the problem and solution simply?

• States the problem very clear, although a solution was never really generated

3. Does the piece address the counter arguments?

• No it does not

4. Is the Op-Ed interesting?

• Not for me since I'm not into basketball...? If I liked basketball I'm sure it would be an interesting topic

5. Are the paragraphs organized logically?

• Yes

6. Does each paragraph develop an idea to support the thesis?

• Everything goes together, although the thesis could have been a little more clear

7. Is the writing clear?

• The writing is very non-chalant and conversational. It would be more clear if it was structured more and had more 'flow' to it.